The Trump administration weakened the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) by redefining the law. In doing so, they removed protections for birds from avoidable deaths caused by industrial activity.
- Conservationists view this policy change as unconstitutional and against the MBTA’s purpose. However, no lawsuits have been filed yet.
- Law Reinterpreted: The Trump administration weakened the 107-year old Migratory Bird Treaty Act by issuing a memo that reinterprets the meaning of the law.
- Limiting Protections: The administration now asserts the MBTA prohibits only intentional killings of migratory birds—not avoidable deaths caused by industrial activity.
- Industry Exemption: This reinterpretation would exempt industries from penalties for avoidable bird deaths (AKA incidental take) from activities like oil drilling and construction.
- Conservation Backlash: According to National Audubon Society: "These protections from “incidental take” have successfully been implemented by both Republican and Democratic administrations for decades and have saved millions of birds."
- National Audubon Society has historically led litigation and grassroots campaigns to defend the MBTA. You can help by following and supporting their efforts.